首页> 外文OA文献 >Effect of timing of a deficit-irrigation allocation on corn evapotranspiration, yield, water use efficiency and dry mass
【2h】

Effect of timing of a deficit-irrigation allocation on corn evapotranspiration, yield, water use efficiency and dry mass

机译:亏缺灌溉时间对玉米蒸散量,产量,水分利用效率和干重的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Water regulations have decreased irrigation water supplies in Nebraska and some other areas of the USA Great Plains. When available water is not enough to meet crop water requirements during the entire growing cycle, it becomes critical to know the proper irrigation timing that would maximize yields and profits. This study evaluated the effect of timing of a deficit-irrigation allocation (150 mm) on crop evapotranspiration (ETc), yield, water use efficiency (WUE = yield/ETc), irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE = yield/irrigation), and dry mass (DM) of corn (Zea mays L.) irrigated with subsurface drip irrigation in the semiarid climate of North Platte, NE. During 2005 and 2006, a total of sixteen irrigation treatments (eight each year) were evaluated, which received different percentages of the water allocation during July, August, and September. During both years, all treatments resulted in no crop stress during the vegetative period and stress during the reproductive stages, which affected ETc, DM, yield, WUE and IWUE. Among treatments, ETc varied by 7.2 and 18.8%; yield by 17 and 33%; WUE by 12 and 22%, and IWUE by 18 and 33% in 2005 and 2006, respectively. Yield and WUE both increased linearly with ETc and with ETc/ETp (ETp = seasonal ETc with no water stress), and WUE increased linearly with yield. The yield response factor (ky) averaged 1.50 over the two seasons. Irrigation timing affected the DM of the plant, grain, and cob, but not that of the stover. It also affected the percent of DM partitioned to the grain (harvest index), which increased linearly with ETc and averaged 56.2% over the two seasons, but did not affect the percent allocated to the cob or stover. Irrigation applied in July had the highest positive coefficient of determination (R2) with yield. This high positive correlation decreased considerably for irrigation applied in August, and became negative for irrigation applied in September. The best positive correlation between the soil water deficit factor (Ks) and yield occurred during weeks 12-14 from crop emergence, during the "milk" and "dough" growth stages. Yield was poorly correlated to stress during weeks 15 and 16, and the correlation became negative after week 17. Dividing the 150 mm allocation about evenly among July, August and September was a good strategy resulting in the highest yields in 2005, but not in 2006. Applying a larger proportion of the allocation in July was a good strategy during both years, and the opposite resulted when applying a large proportion of the allocation in September. The different results obtained between years indicate that flexible irrigation scheduling techniques should be adopted, rather than relying on fixed timing strategies.
机译:水法规减少了内布拉斯加州和美国大平原其他地区的灌溉水供应。当可用水不足以在整个生长周期中满足农作物水分需求时,了解适当的灌溉时间以最大化产量和利润就变得至关重要。这项研究评估了缺水灌溉时间(150 mm)对作物蒸散量(ETc),产量,水利用效率(WUE =产量/ ETc),灌溉用水效率(IWUE =产量/灌溉)和在东北北部普拉特半干旱气候下,通过地下滴灌灌溉玉米(Zea mays L.)的干重(DM)。在2005年和2006年期间,总共评估了16种灌溉方法(每年8种),分别在7月,8月和9月接受了不同百分比的水分配。在这两个年度中,所有处理均在营养期无作物胁迫,在生殖期无胁迫,影响了ETc,DM,产量,WUE和IWUE。在治疗中,ETc分别为7.2和18.8%。收率分别提高17%和33%;在2005年和2006年,WUE分别增长了12%和22%,IWUE增长了18%和33%。产量和水分利用效率均随ETc和ETc / ETp线性增加(ETp =无水分胁迫的季节性ETc),而水分利用效率随产量线性增加。在两个季节中,产量响应因子(ky)平均为1.50。灌溉时间影响植物,谷物和穗轴的干物质,但不影响秸秆的干物质。它还影响了DM在谷物中的分配百分比(收获指数),该百分比随ETc线性增加,在两个季节中平均为56.2%,但不影响分配给玉米芯或秸秆的百分比。 7月进行的灌溉具有最高的正测定系数(R2)和产量。这种高的正相关性在8月的灌溉中显着下降,而在9月的灌溉中呈负相关。土壤水分亏缺因子(Ks)与单产之间的最佳正相关发生在作物出苗的第12至14周的“牛奶”和“面团”生长阶段。在第15周和第16周,产量与压力的相关性很差,在第17周后,相关性变为负值。在150mm的分配中,在7月,8月和9月之间平均分配是一个很好的策略,导致2005年的最高产量,但2006年却没有在这两个年度中,在7月中使用较大比例的分配是一个不错的策略,而在9月中使用较大比例的分配会导致相反的结果。几年之间获得的不同结果表明,应该采用灵活的灌溉调度技术,而不是依赖固定的定时策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号